Results for Chemical Groups

You may use, distribute or copy the information in these data tables, with attribution to Biomonitoring California.
For more information, visit our researchers page or contact us.
Results on page last updated:

Chemical Group: Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)

  • Measured in: Serum

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 1

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/ml 96 0.987 0.870 1.12 0.65 0.948 1.33 2.24 99% 0.250

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/ml 99 1.10 0.988 1.22 0.84 1.08 1.49 2.21 99% 0.250

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 1.Pilot

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 110 0.994 0.920 1.07 0.730 0.984 1.35 1.86 100% 0.0154 ng/mL

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 2.Expanded

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 337 0.739 0.660 0.827 0.497 0.764 1.18 1.95 99.5% 0.0282 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ○Expanded BEST data from 337 participants was weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Central Valley. Unweighted results are available to download on the Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) – 2. Expanded project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA)

CARE LA Study logo, showing California in blue with Los Angeles County in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 425 0.298 0.263 0.339 0.195 0.320 0.471 1.16 96.9% 0.0424 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ▶CARE-LA data were weighted (a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented demographic characteristics in a study sample) so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Los Angeles County. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2)

Logo for the CARE-2 study showing a blue map of California with the eastern part of California in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 358 0.211 0.181 0.246 0.132 0.256 0.374 0.775 89.5% 0.0424 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ◀CARE-2 data from 358 participants were weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Mono, and Inyo counties. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 3 (CARE-3)

Logo for the CARE-3 study showing a blue map of California with Orange and San Diego counties in orange
  • Study Group Subset: Adults

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 89 0.295 0.245 0.356 0.216 0.335 0.524 0.762 92.1% 0.0424 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ⌂Due to the COVID-19 emergency, CARE-3 was stopped early and only 90 people completed all study steps. The results from this small non-representative sample cannot be generalized to the population of San Diego and Orange counties.

Project: California Teachers Study (CTS)

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 1719 0.92 0.89 0.95 0.67 0.95 1.3 2.3 99.7% 0.014

Project: Firefighter Occupational Exposures (FOX) Project

  • Study Group Subset: Firefighters

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of detection (LOD)
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 101 1.15 1.06 1.25 0.888 1.13 1.49 2.21 100% 0.075

Project: Maternal and Infant Environmental Exposure Project (MIEEP)

  • Study Group Subset: Pregnant women

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 77 0.733 0.621 0.865 0.504 0.791 1.11 1.74 0.075

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 1

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA NA ng/mL 200 0.647 0.596 0.703 0.442 0.644 0.952 1.74 100% 0.0302 ng/mL

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 2

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFNA PFNA ng/mL 292 0.542 0.509 0.578 0.372 0.527 0.774 1.39 100% 0.0487 ng/mL

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 3

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFNA PFNA ng/mL 96 0.406 0.360 0.457 0.263 0.426 0.564 0.830 100% 0.0767 ng/mL